SEO Copywriting – relevant results or quality content?

Buzzwords recently switched to a content managed website (CMS) to speed up the addition of new content.  To make sure new pages were indexed as soon as possible, the decision was taken to upload ’skeleton’ pages to start with and then add quality content later.  The initial pages comprised a relevant, robot-friendly URL, appropriate meta tags and some examples of previous work.  

Although some of these new pages were for low-competition, long-tail keywords, I’ve been amazed to see them feature on Page One of both Google and Yahoo.  This begs the question about the extent to which ranking is based on quality content, and how much depends on relevance.  (The other criterion of  ‘inbound links’ doesn’t apply to these all-new pages and can therefore be discounted from the equation.)

For those who search for a long-tail keyword (or something less than generic), there would seem to be little guarantee of quality content.  All they can hope for is that ‘relevance’ will ultimately deliver the quality content and information they need.  In the meantime, could this be seen as a flaw in the system of ’search’ that only I have noticed?  That’s highly unlikely, but it does suggest that care should be taken when interpreting the worth of top ranking search results pages (SERPS).